Significant Assignments

Industrial Tenant Representation
300,000 SF warehouse – SEVES USA – Houston, TX
200,000 SF warehouse – Sears, Roebuck and Co. – Garland, TX
197,400 SF warehouse – Camping World – Ft. Worth, TX
144,000 SF warehouse – Sears, Roebuck and Co. – Sacramento, CA
141,000 SF warehouse – Kinder Morgan Materials Services – Hammond, IN
131,000 SF warehouse – Victory Packaging – Atlanta, GA
  95,000 SF warehouse – Sears Logistics Services – Grapevine, TX
  87,757 SF warehouse – Airxcel, Inc. – Elkhart, IN
  79,500 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Houston, TX  
  75,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Tukwila, WA  
  71,000 SF warehouse – Victory Packaging – Auburn, WA    
  57,000 SF warehouse – Victory Packaging – Chesapeake, VA
  54,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Houston, TX
  53,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Indianapolis, IN
  50,000 SF warehouse – The Coast Distribution System – Denver, CO
  49,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Baton Rouge, LA
  49,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Portland, OR   
  46,000 SF warehouse – Sears Logistics Services – Tampa, FL  
  46,000 SF warehouse – The Coast Distribution System – Wilsonville, OR
  45,000 SF warehouse – Superior Plus Construction Products Corp. – Louisville, KY    
  45,000 SF warehouse – BASF Corporation – St. Louis, MO  

Other Relevant Industrial Projects
1,900,000 SF warehouse – Undisclosed Client – Undisclosed Location

ICSG provided a disposition analysis and consulting services on the best course of action for our undisclosed client’s large distribution facility

1,000,000 SF – 600,000 SF warehouse per location – Undisclosed Client – Multiple U.S. markets

ICSG provided strategic consulting services to an undisclosed third party logistics (3PL) client in its assessment of a multi-market customer requirement and was tasked with coming up with a creative solution that would accommodate the 3PL’s customer’s needs while maximizing the lease structure flexibility for the 3PL